. .
.
Per una volta Berlusconi ha detto una cosa giusta. Ovviamente, oltre ad averne rovesciato il segno, trasformando il positivo in negativo, si è servito di una forma espressiva, concretata nel rivelatorio verbo "inculcare", assai infelice; ma la sostanza è ricca: l'educazione che la scuola statale impartisce agli studenti dello stato italiano, appunto, differisce spesso dall'orizzonte dei valori di una parte delle famiglie. Evviva Iddio. Nel loro liberalismo incolto gli apologeti della scuola sedicente libera, e detrattori della scuola di stato, ritengono che l'educazione, i suoi principi, i suoi fini e i suoi metodi, pertengano in ultima analisi alla scelta delle famiglie. Questa chiave di lettura "privatistica" del processo educativo, che tratta la formazione come l'abbligliamento, per cui ciascuno può sceglire l' habitus che più gli aggrada, ignora la dimensione collettiva o intersoggettiva delle istituzioni educative. Si tornerà forse al precettore privato. Si arriva a poter formulare il paradosso secondo il quale le famiglie che agognassero una scuola mussoliniana o ispirata al principio mafioso dell'omertà, o addirittura ai valori del cosiddetto "velinismo", potrebbero legittimamente aspirare alla parità e chiedere, in nome della libertà di scelta, l'erogazione dei buoni scuola. Purtroppo, però, children do not belong to parents in the form of property, but only in that responsibility. The children are part of the community, and they are the custodians of the right to educational freedom, not families. The children have that right to form freely with respect to the beliefs of their parents. They are entitled to have many educational models, and choose accordingly, on their own, what to do with their lives. School education is often the task of balancing the educational influence, or lack thereof, in the family. We will remember perhaps only when it comes to schooling of children of immigrants or Roma? In Anglo-Saxon countries the freedom to choose educational institution has a long tradition, but here the difference between schools is not measured on a scale of values, but on efficiency, quality and distinction. In our pseudo-liberalism, however, we show how school "free" school confessional. And anyone who has attended a high school should know that the father of modern liberalism - John Locke - considers "free education" the anti-dogmatism, and especially the experiential learning exercise in critical thinking (it was he who introduced this term). Question: the sectarian private schools can provide this approach? No, and for a very simple reason: their system of teacher recruitment is dependent on an axiological framework. If the school was the much-maligned system lists of contests and give assurance to the students the opportunity to have teachers not selected for ideological system, the private school it does not necessarily (except some institutions, especially universities, to secular inspiration). When settled minister Gelmini, fearing for my job, I took courage and went to have a chat with an old friend became a priest and editor of a very prestigious school equally. I offered my availability. He liked my resume, and was really fond of me, I saw him, yet he explained that as a Catholic school in need of a guarantee for you. That is, as claimed by Berlusconi himself, families expect a continuity between what they teach their children and what they learn in school. In other words, I mentioned that some particular topics (eg abortion, euthanasia, homosexuality) that I should express the thesis pro-Catholic, and indeed, particularly on homosexuality, I would have to define it as "emotional illness" because they could not risk of being - his words - "a teacher who voted for the Radicals." Gliss completely propostomi salary, and a sense of decency. My duty as a citizen would be to sue him for infringement of the laws on ideological discrimination in the allocation of a job, but it was an informal chat, non un colloquio vero e proprio. Mi dichiarai contrario, il posto non lo presi, e non ci siamo più sentiti. Omosessualità come "malattia affettiva"? Queste stronzate i genitori possono dirle tra le mura domestiche, ma non si può chiedere a un insegnante serio di ripeterle. E potrei allungare l'elenco con la non ammissione dei disabili nelle scuole riconosciute come paritarie. Che valore esprime? Ci piace? E il fatto che quando uno studente si lamenta di un insegnante quest'ultimo viene trasferito o licenziato, che valore esprime? Ci piace? Allora: chi è illiberale? quale scuola è incompatibile con i valori espressi nel liberalismo stesso (che non significa relativismo dei valori, ma riconscimento del valore della libertà)?Non I say that public teachers are all equally good or all equally motivated, but at least they are not blackmailed - for now - and this simple fact, beyond their individuality, is a value in itself, a liberal value, in fact. If freedom of choice of education signfica leave the arbitrary selfishness of the family formation processes, then firmly and ideally repeat: long live the free school, the school was alive!
.
.
.
0 comments:
Post a Comment